Virtus InterPress
  • Home »
  • News »
  • A collection of empirical and theoretical papers on the board of directors »

A collection of empirical and theoretical papers on the board of directors

The editorial team of the publishing house “Virtus Interpress” has prepared the collection of empirical and theoretical papers published in Corporate Ownership and Control journal during last few years dedicated to the board of directors.

  1. Kao, L., & Chen, A. (2004). The effects of board characteristics on earnings management. Corporate Ownership & Control, 1(3), 96-107. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv1i3p9
  2. Davidson, W. N., & Rowe, W. (2004). Intertemporal endogeneity in board composition and financial performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 1(4), 49-60. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv1i4p4
  3. Constantinou, C., Trigeorgis, L. , & Vafeas, N. (2005). Target board structure and takeover-induced abnormal returns in the UK. Corporate Ownership & Control, 3(1), 101-113. http://doi.org/10.22495/ cocv3i1p9
  4. Andert, D. M. (2007). Why do directors feel so separate when they are interconnected? Corporate Ownership & Control, 5(1), 155-157. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv5i1p13
  5. Maingot, M., & Zéghal, D. (2008). The adjustments of corporate governance mechanisms in Canadian banks following regulatory changes. Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(2-4), 443-455. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i2c4p3
  6. Mezghanni, B. S. (2008). Ownership structure, board of directors and R&D investments: evidence from France. Corporate Ownership & Control, 5(3-2), 250-262. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv5i3c2p1
  7. Alas, R., & Tafel , K. (2008). Corporate governance in Estonia. Corporate Ownership & Control, 5(4-2), 296-301. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv5i4c2p7
  8. Nazir, M. S., Ali, S., & Haque, A. (2009). Can board mechanism affect the firm value in Pakistan? Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(3-2), 308-317. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i3c2p5
  9. Cuong, N. H. (2011). Factors causing Enron’s collapse: An investigation into corporate governance and company culture. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(3-6), 585-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i3c6p2
  10. Prokofieva, M., & Muniandy, B. (2011). Board composition and audit fee: Evidence from Russia. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(2-5), 551-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2c5p5
  11. Chou, S., Yang, H. L., & Tong, J. J. (2011). Do directors’ outside appointments hurt board effectiveness: An analysis under familial dominance in the Taiwan case. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(1-1), 203-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i1c1art8
  12. Stein, G., & Plaza, S. (2011). The role of the independent director in CEO supervision and turnover. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(1), 40-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i1art2
  13. Ishak, Z., Manaf, N. A. A., & Md Kassim, A. A. (2011). Quality of board of directors and capital structure decisions in Malaysian companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(4-2), 264-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i4c2art3
  14. Satkunasingam, E., & Sern Cherk, A. Y. (2012). The influence of cultural values on the board of directors: Lessons from five corporations. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(4-2),221-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i4c2art3
  15. Ellili, N.O.D. (2012). The ownership structure, the board of directors and the corporate performance: Complementarity or substitutability? Evidence from companies listed on Abu Dhabi stock exchange. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(3-2), 276-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i3c2art5
  16. Bettinelli, C., & Caviezel, V. (2012). An exploration of board effectiveness in family businesses using a scaling approach. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(3), 27-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i3art2
  17. Ujunwa, A., Nwakoby, I., & Ugbam, C. O. (2012). Corporate board diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(2-1), 216-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i2c1art6
  18. Balta, M.E.B., Woods, A., & Dickson, K. (2012). The role environment and boards of directors’ characteristics on innovation: An empirical evidence of Greek listed firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(4-4), 429-440 . http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i4c4art6
  19. Martins, H. C., Gonçalves, C. A., Neto, J. A. S., Gonçalves, M. A., & Muniz R. M. (2012). Strategic corporate governance in family business: A study on the board of directors’ roles and responsibilities. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(2), 9-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i2art1
  20. Stein, G., Gallego, M., & Cuadrado, M. (2013). CEO succession and proprietary directors: evidence from Spanish listed firms. [Conference issue]. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(1-2), 140-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/ cocv11i1conf2p5
  21. Riabichenko, D. (2013). Organizational peculiarities of bank liquidity management: international experience and Ukrainian practice. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(1-11), 907-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i1c11p2
  22. Romano, M., & Favino, C. (2013). Board composition and interlocking directorate evolution as a consequence of the recent financial crisis: evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(1-1),175-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/ cocv11i1c1art5
  23. Berthelot, S., Bilodeau, J., & Davignon, K. (2013). The impact of directors’ tenure on executive compensation and corporate financial performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(2-1), 164-172. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i2c1art2
  24. Cucinelli, D. (2013). The impact of board diversity on operating performance and firm risk: Evidence from the Italian market. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(2), 91-103. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i2art7
  25. Fekadu, G.W. (2015). Corporate governance on financial performance of insurance industry. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-10), 1201-1209. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c1
Corporate Governance Experts Global Repository
Merio Honor Честь
Ryoushin Conscience Совесть
Kouki Nobility Доброе имя