A collection of empirical papers on corporate (firm) performance UPDATED April 12, 2019

The editorial team of the publishing house “Virtus Interpress” has prepared the list of empirical papers published in Corporate Ownership and Control journal during last few years devoted to the questions of corporate (firm) performance.

We hope that the aforementioned collection of papers will be useful for those scholars pursuing research in the field of corporate governance (specifically corporate/firm performance issues):

  1. La Rosa, F., Bernini, F., & Mariani, G. (2018). Diversified, integrated and cross-border acquisitions and firm performance: A comparison of family and non-family Italian listed firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 16(1), 72-86. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv16i1art8
  2. Oliveira, M., & Carvalhal, A. (2018). Do football clubs with good governance have higher performances? Evidence from Brazil. Corporate Ownership & Control, 16(1), 7-12. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv16i1art1
  3. Khan, B., Nijhof, A., Diepeveen, R. A., & Melis, D. A. M. (2018). Does good corporate governance lead to better firm performance? Strategic lessons from a structured literature review. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(4), 73-85. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i4art7
  4. Rukundo, J. B. (2017). Firm performance and innovation in the developing countries: Evidence from firm-level survey. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-1), 235-245. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c1p7
  5. Cambrea, D. R., Lussana, G., Quarato, F., & Varacca Capello, P. (2017). Top management team diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from the fashion and luxury industry. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-2), 325-340. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p2
  6. Scafarto, V., Ricci, F., Della Corte, G., & De Luca, P. (2017). Board structure, ownership concentration and corporate performance: Italian evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-2), 347-359. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p4
  7. Owusu, A., Holmes, M., & Agyemang, J. (2017). The performance consequences of board structure changes: Evidence from Ghana. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-2), 421-434.http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p11
  8. Tuccillo, D., Ferrone, C., & Agliata, F. (2018). Evaluation of the integration between corporate and financial performance: The social impact bond financial instrument. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(3), 138-144. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i3art12
  9. Ntoung, A. T. L., Vila Biglieri, J. E., Outman, B. C., Masárová, E., Babounia, A., & Kome, C. M. (2017). Family firms and performance empirical analysis from Spain. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4-2), 380-395. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c2art4
  10. Hassouna, D., Ouda, H., & Hussainey, K. (2017). Transparency and disclosure as an internal corporate governance mechanism and corporate performance: Egypt’s case. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4-1), 182-195. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c1art1
  11. Hundal, S. (2017). Multiple directorships of corporate boards and firm performance in India. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4), 150-164. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4art13
  12. Kyriazopoulos, G. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance in periods of financial distress. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(3-1), 209-222. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i3c1art7
  13. Abdullah, S. N. (2016). Corporate governance mechanisms and the performance of Malaysian listed firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(1-2), 384-398. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1c2p10
  14. Haryono, U., Iskandar, R., Paminto, A., & Ulfah, Y. (2016). Sustainability performance: It’s impact on risk and value of the firm. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(1-1), 278-286. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1c1p11
  15. Ganguli, S. K. (2016). Persistent high liquidity, ownership structure and firm performance: Indian evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(1), 38-47. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1p4
  16. Zemzem, A., & Ftouhi, K. (2016). External corporate governance, tax planning, and firm performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(3-3), 523-532. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i3c3p11
  17. Iacoviello, G., Mazzei, M., & Riccardi, G. (2015). The gender composition of the board and firm performance. The role of regulatory measures. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-11), 1385-1395. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i10
  18. Portal, M. T., & Basso, L. F. C. (2015). The effect of family control and management on performance, capital structure, cash holding, and cash dividends. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-10), 1134-1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c10p2
  19. Mateus, C., Hall, T., & Mateus, I. B. (2015). Are listed firms better governed? Empirical evidence on board structure and financial performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-7), 736-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c7p2
  20. Ndayisaba, G., & Ahmed, A. D. (2015). CEO remuneration, board composition and firm performance: empirical evidence from Australian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-5), 534-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c5p2
  21. Bruno, P., & Carvalhal, A. (2015). Firm valuation, performance and origin of controlling shareholder in Brazil. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(4-5), 535-540. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4c5p3
  22. Nulla, Y. M. (2015). Pay for performance: An empirical review. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(4), 69-79. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4p5
  23. Farooq, S., Ahmed, S., & Saleem, K. (2015). Overinvestment, growth opportunities and firm performance: Evidence from Singapore stock market. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(3-4), 454-467. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i3c4p6
  24. Basuony, M. A. K., Elseidi, R. I., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: Evidence form a MENA country. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(1-9), 761-774. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i1c9p1
  25. Wang, Y., & Chen, C. W. (2014). Board structure, D&O insurance and the variability of firm performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(1-2), 259-270. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i1c2p4
  26. Cheng, M. A., & Leung, N. W. (2014). Ownership structure, ongoing related party transactions and corporate performance: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(2-5), 446-464. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i2c5p2
  27. Farooq, O., & Satt, H. (2014). Does analyst following improve firm performance? Evidence from the MENA region. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(2-1), 157-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i2c1p1
  28. Mohamed, E. K. A., Basuony, M. A., & Badawi, A. A. (2013). The impact of corporate governance on firm performance in Egyptian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(1-7), 691-705. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i1c7art6
  29. Kanagaretnam, K., Lobo, G. J., & Whalen, D. J. (2013). Relationship between board independence and firm performance post Sarbanes Oxley. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(1), 65-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i1art6
  30. Di Carlo, E., & Ranalli, F. (2013). Corporate performance and boards’ dilemma of listed subsidiaries. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(4), 130-147. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i4art10
  31. Emmanuel, T., Carvalhal, A., & Avila, M. (2012). Does social responsibility matter for firm performance? Evidence from Brazil. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(3), 132-141. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i3art11
  32. Jiang, H., & Habib, A. (2012). Ownership concentration, free cash flow agency problem and future firm performance: New Zealand evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(3), 96-110. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i3art8
  33. Hu, D., & Zheng, H. (2012). Corporate governance and performance: Evidence from Chinese private listed companies based on cash flow rights and control rights. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(2), 85-93. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i2art7