A collection of empirical papers on corporate (firm) performance (UPDATED June 5, 2020)

The editorial team of the publishing house “Virtus Interpress” has prepared the list of empirical papers published in Corporate Ownership and Control journal during last few years devoted to the questions of corporate (firm) performance.

We hope that the aforementioned collection of papers will be useful for those scholars pursuing research in the field of corporate governance (specifically corporate/firm performance issues):

  1. Braendle, U., Stiglbauer, M., Ababneh, K., & Dedousis, E. (2020). The impact of board diversity on firm performance – The case of Germany. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(2), 183-193. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i2art15
  2. Mantovani, G. M., & Moscato, G. (2020). Shareholder composition, corporate governance and their monitoring effects on firm performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(2), 165-182. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i2art14
  3. Karamoy, H., & Tulung, J. E. (2020). The effect of financial performance and corporate governance to stock price in non-bank financial industry. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(2), 97-103. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i2art9
  4. Campa, D., Torchia, M., Marceselli, C. R. C., & Sargenti, P. (2020). Founder succession and firm performance in the luxury industry. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(2), 88-96. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i2art8
  5. Nigri, G., Del Baldo, M., & Agulini, A. (2020). Integrated sustainable performance management systems: A case study on Italian benefit corporations. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(2), 65-76. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i2art6
  6. Onyina, P. A., & Gyanor, D. K. (2019). Do corporate governance practices affect the performance of firms listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange? Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(1), 107-115. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i1art10
  7. Wang, P., Barrese, J., & Pooser, D. (2019). Performance in financial services: Does institutional ownership matter? Corporate Ownership & Control, 16(2), 108-120. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv16i2art11
  8. Shaban, O. S., Al-Hawatma, Z., & Abdallah, A. A. (2019). Mergers and acquisitions in Jordan: Its motives and influence on company financial performance and stock market price. Corporate Ownership & Control, 16(2), 67-72. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv16i2art7
  9. La Rosa, F., Bernini, F., & Mariani, G. (2018). Diversified, integrated and cross-border acquisitions and firm performance: A comparison of family and non-family Italian listed firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 16(1), 72-86. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv16i1art8
  10. Oliveira, M., & Carvalhal, A. (2018). Do football clubs with good governance have higher performances? Evidence from Brazil. Corporate Ownership & Control, 16(1), 7-12. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv16i1art1
  11. Khan, B., Nijhof, A., Diepeveen, R. A., & Melis, D. A. M. (2018). Does good corporate governance lead to better firm performance? Strategic lessons from a structured literature review. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(4), 73-85. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i4art7
  12. Rukundo, J. B. (2017). Firm performance and innovation in the developing countries: Evidence from firm-level survey. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-1), 235-245. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c1p7
  13. Cambrea, D. R., Lussana, G., Quarato, F., & Varacca Capello, P. (2017). Top management team diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from the fashion and luxury industry. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-2), 325-340. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p2
  14. Scafarto, V., Ricci, F., Della Corte, G., & De Luca, P. (2017). Board structure, ownership concentration and corporate performance: Italian evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-2), 347-359. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p4
  15. Owusu, A., Holmes, M., & Agyemang, J. (2017). The performance consequences of board structure changes: Evidence from Ghana. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-2), 421-434.http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p11
  16. Tuccillo, D., Ferrone, C., & Agliata, F. (2018). Evaluation of the integration between corporate and financial performance: The social impact bond financial instrument. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(3), 138-144. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i3art12
  17. Ntoung, A. T. L., Vila Biglieri, J. E., Outman, B. C., Masárová, E., Babounia, A., & Kome, C. M. (2017). Family firms and performance empirical analysis from Spain. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4-2), 380-395. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c2art4
  18. Hassouna, D., Ouda, H., & Hussainey, K. (2017). Transparency and disclosure as an internal corporate governance mechanism and corporate performance: Egypt’s case. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4-1), 182-195. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c1art1
  19. Hundal, S. (2017). Multiple directorships of corporate boards and firm performance in India. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4), 150-164. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4art13
  20. Kyriazopoulos, G. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance in periods of financial distress. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(3-1), 209-222. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i3c1art7
  21. Abdullah, S. N. (2016). Corporate governance mechanisms and the performance of Malaysian listed firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(1-2), 384-398. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1c2p10
  22. Haryono, U., Iskandar, R., Paminto, A., & Ulfah, Y. (2016). Sustainability performance: It’s impact on risk and value of the firm. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(1-1), 278-286. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1c1p11
  23. Ganguli, S. K. (2016). Persistent high liquidity, ownership structure and firm performance: Indian evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(1), 38-47. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1p4
  24. Zemzem, A., & Ftouhi, K. (2016). External corporate governance, tax planning, and firm performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(3-3), 523-532. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i3c3p11
  25. Iacoviello, G., Mazzei, M., & Riccardi, G. (2015). The gender composition of the board and firm performance. The role of regulatory measures. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-11), 1385-1395. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i10
  26. Portal, M. T., & Basso, L. F. C. (2015). The effect of family control and management on performance, capital structure, cash holding, and cash dividends. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-10), 1134-1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c10p2
  27. Mateus, C., Hall, T., & Mateus, I. B. (2015). Are listed firms better governed? Empirical evidence on board structure and financial performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-7), 736-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c7p2
  28. Ndayisaba, G., & Ahmed, A. D. (2015). CEO remuneration, board composition and firm performance: empirical evidence from Australian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-5), 534-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c5p2
  29. Bruno, P., & Carvalhal, A. (2015). Firm valuation, performance and origin of controlling shareholder in Brazil. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(4-5), 535-540. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4c5p3
  30. Nulla, Y. M. (2015). Pay for performance: An empirical review. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(4), 69-79. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4p5
  31. Farooq, S., Ahmed, S., & Saleem, K. (2015). Overinvestment, growth opportunities and firm performance: Evidence from Singapore stock market. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(3-4), 454-467. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i3c4p6
  32. Basuony, M. A. K., Elseidi, R. I., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: Evidence form a MENA country. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(1-9), 761-774. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i1c9p1
  33. Wang, Y., & Chen, C. W. (2014). Board structure, D&O insurance and the variability of firm performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(1-2), 259-270. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i1c2p4
  34. Cheng, M. A., & Leung, N. W. (2014). Ownership structure, ongoing related party transactions and corporate performance: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(2-5), 446-464. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i2c5p2
  35. Farooq, O., & Satt, H. (2014). Does analyst following improve firm performance? Evidence from the MENA region. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(2-1), 157-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i2c1p1
  36. Mohamed, E. K. A., Basuony, M. A., & Badawi, A. A. (2013). The impact of corporate governance on firm performance in Egyptian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(1-7), 691-705. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i1c7art6
  37. Kanagaretnam, K., Lobo, G. J., & Whalen, D. J. (2013). Relationship between board independence and firm performance post Sarbanes Oxley. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(1), 65-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i1art6
  38. Di Carlo, E., & Ranalli, F. (2013). Corporate performance and boards’ dilemma of listed subsidiaries. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(4), 130-147. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i4art10
  39. Emmanuel, T., Carvalhal, A., & Avila, M. (2012). Does social responsibility matter for firm performance? Evidence from Brazil. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(3), 132-141. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i3art11
  40. Jiang, H., & Habib, A. (2012). Ownership concentration, free cash flow agency problem and future firm performance: New Zealand evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(3), 96-110. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i3art8
  41. Hu, D., & Zheng, H. (2012). Corporate governance and performance: Evidence from Chinese private listed companies based on cash flow rights and control rights. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(2), 85-93. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i2art7
  42. You, C. F., Hsu, A. C., & Shih, T. L. (2011). Dividend payouts and companies performance in Taiwan. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(1-6), 609-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i1c6art4
  43. Capizzi, V., Giovannini, R., & Pesic, V. (2011). Does corporate governance really matter for firms performance? Evidence from Italian IPOs market. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(1-6), 569-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i1c6art1
  44. Berthelot, S., Di Vito, J., & Gagné, V. (2011). Evaluating the performance of board members: A portrait of Canadian firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(3), 86-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i3p7
  45. Cotter, R., Dason, J., Niu, J., & Klein, P. (2011). Corporate governance and stock performance: Evidence from Canadian firms over the period 2005-2009. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(3), 56-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i3p5
  46. Brogi, M. (2011). Board, governance and firm performance: Are financial intermediaries different? [Special issue]. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(2), 60-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2sip6
  47. Tutino, M. (2011). Which metrics are relevant in European listed companies? Evidence from nineties. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(2-5), 566-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2c5p6
  48. Darmadi, S. (2011). Board diversity and firm performance: The Indonesian evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(2-4), 450-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2c4p4
  49. Ali Ahmed, H. J., & Wadud, I. K. M. M. (2011). Market based performance: Do ownership structures, or firm policy choice matter? Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(2), 89-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2p8