• Home
• About us
• News
• A collection of empirical papers on corporate social responsibility (updated August 14, 2023)

A collection of empirical papers on corporate social responsibility (updated August 14, 2023)

The editorial team of the Corporate Ownership and Control journal has updated the following collection of papers in order to help our readers and scholars pursuing research in this field find more information devoted to the topic of corporate social responsibility.

1. Naude, M. (2009). Corporate governance, CSR and using mental models in employee retention. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(1), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv7i1p7
2. Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C. & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and innovation in European companies. An empirical research. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(1-2), 274-284. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv7i1c2p3
3. Andrew, N., & Wickham, M. (2010). The voluntary CSR disclosure in corporate annual reports: Evidence from Australia. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(1), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i1p4
4. Soana, M.-G. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from the financial sector. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(2), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2p3
5. Abdullah, S. N., Mohamad, N. R., & Mokhtar, M. Z. (2011). Board independence, ownership and CSR of Malaysian large firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(2-4), 467-483. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2c4p5
6. Liu, Q., & de Villiers, C. (2011). Does the provision of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure influence the cost of equity capital? Evidence from Australia and the United Kingdom. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(4-1), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i4c1p6
7. Hussainey, K., Elsayed, M., & Razik, M. A. (2011). Factors affecting corporate social responsibility disclosure in Egypt. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(4-4), 432-443. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i4c4art5
8. Wu, S., Lin, F., & Wu, C. (2012). A study on Taiwanese corporate social responsibility and ownership structures. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(3), 11-122. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i3art9
9. Emmanuel, T., Carvalhal, A., & Avila, M. (2012). Does social responsibility matter for firm performance? Evidence from Brazil. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(3), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i3art11
10. Wu, C., Hsieh, C. H., & Lin, F. (2012). Corporate social performance, cost of capital and the ownership in Taiwanese advantage technology industry. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(3-1), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i3c1art4
11. Yaftian, A., Wise, V., Cooper, K., & Mirshekary, S. (2012). Social reporting in the annual reports of Iranian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i1art2
12. Carvalhal, A., Tavares, E. (2013). Does social responsibility enhance firm value and return in Brazil? Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(2-2), 253-257. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i2c2art4
13. Joshi, M., Sidhu, J., & Kansal, M. (2013). Corporate social disclosures in the knowledge-based sector in an emerging economy. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(3-2), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i3c2art1
14. Kühn, A. L., Stiglbauer, M., & Zschäckel, E. (2013). Values-based management in cooperative banks: Balancing self-perception with public perception? Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(3), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i3siart6
15. Kostyuk, A., Kostyuk, O., Mozghovyi, Y., & Kravchenko, Y. (2013). Corporate social responsibility index for Ukrainian banks: The essentials for implementation. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(4-4), 434-445. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i4c4art6
16. Kühn, A. L., Stiglbauer, M. & Heel, J. (2014). Does mandatory CSR reporting lead to higher CSR transparency? The case of France. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(2), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i2p3
17. Molate, M. C., de Klerk, M., & Ferreira, P. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosures by South African mining companies: The Marikana massacre. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(4-3), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i4c3p2
18. Basuony, M. A. K., Elseidi, R. I., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: Evidence form a MENA country. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(1-9), 761-774. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i1c9p1
19. Suttipun, M. (2014). Corporate characteristics, social responsibility reporting, and financial performance: Evidence in Thailand. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(1-9), 836-846. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i1c9p7
20. Sariannidis, N., Konteos, G., & Giannarakis, G. (2015). The effects of greenhouse gas emissions and governance factors on corporate socially responsibility disclosure. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(2), 92-106. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i2p8
21. Hafez, H. M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical study on Egyptian banks. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(2), 107-127. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i2p9
22. Khumalo, G., & Pitt, L. J. (2015). The determinants of CSR disclosure of firms listed on the JSE: A focus on firms meeting the SRI index criteria. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i2p11
23. Fiori, G., di Donato, F., & Izzo, M. F. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and stock prices: A study on the Italian market. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(2-6), 600-609. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i2c6p3
24. Hossain, M., Chowdhury, M. H., Evans, R., & Lema, A. C. (2015). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from a developing country. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(3-4), 474-487. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i3c4p8
25. Manzoni, A., & Islam, S. M. N. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and organisation behaviour. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(4-6), 647-652. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4c6p4
26. Chiang, H.-T., Liu, F.-C. (2015). Family firms control structure and corporate sustainability. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-9), 1088-1100. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c9p10
27. Alotaibi, K., Hussainey, K. (2016). Quantity versus quality: the value relevance of CSR disclosure of Saudi companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(2), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i2p15
28. Bowerman, S., & Sharma, U. (2016). The effect of corporate social responsibility disclosures on share prices in Japan and the UK. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(2-1), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i2c1p2
29. Salguero, J.Q., & Rivera-Camino, J. (2016). CSR serves to compete in the sport industry? An exploratory research in the football sector in Peru. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(3), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i3p5
30. Ju Ahmad, N. B, Rashid, A., & Gow, J. (2017). CEO duality and corporate social responsibility reporting: Evidence from Malaysia. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(2), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i2art7
31. Meutia, I., Mukhtaruddin, Saftiana, Y. & Faisal, M. (2017). CEO’s experience, foreign ownership and corporate social responsibility: A case of manufacturing companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(3-2), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i3c2art12
32. Sitorus, T., & Sitorus, T. V. T. (2017). Good corporate governance and firm value: The role of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4-1), 328-336. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c1art14
33. Njapha, F., & Lekhanya, L. M. (2017). The implications of company corporate social responsibilities on the development of local communities. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4-2), 405-412. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c2art6
34. Yeung, S. M.-C. (2017). Human capital development for sustainability and corporate social responsibility – The case of Kalmar Asia. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4-2), 462-470. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c2art11
35. Vento, G. A., Chiappini, H., & Lia, G. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, social and financial performance: The case study of the loan appraisal process of the Rwanda Development Bank. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(3), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i3art4
36. Yeung, S. M-C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and quality management system in the context of blockchain technology. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(4-1), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i4c1p10
37. Velte, P. (2019). Does board composition influence CSR reporting? A meta-analysis. Corporate Ownership & Control, 16(2), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv16i2art5
38. Velte, P. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and earnings management: A literature review. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(2), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i2art1
39. Fortuna, F., Ciaburri, M., Testarmata, S., & Tiscini, R. (2020). CSR reporting and ownership structure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(3), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i3art11
40. Backhouse, K., & Wickham, M. (2020). Corporate governance, boards of directors and corporate social responsibility: The Australian context. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(4), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i4art5
41. Osemeke, L., Osemeke, N., & Okere, R. O. (2020). The role of board in corporate social responsibility: A normative compliance perspective. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(4), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i4art13
42. Celentano, A., Lepore, L., Pisano, S., D’Amore, G., & Alvino, F. (2020). The joint effect of board independence and CSR committee on CSR disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies [Special issue]. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(4), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i4siart9
43. Lahjie, A. A., Natoli, R., & Zuhair, S. (2021). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: A study of emerging market listed firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 18(2), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i2art7
44. Velte, P. (2022). Corporate social responsibility performance, reporting and generalized methods of moments (GMM): A structured review of corporate governance determinants and firms’ financial consequences. Corporate Ownership & Control, 19(2), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv19i2art1
45. Nagalingam, N., De Silva, L. M. H., Weerasinghe, R. M., Pathirana, T. D., Rajapaksha, C. M., Perera, K. R., & Kaneshwaren, S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A study of the tourism industry in Sri Lanka. Corporate Ownership & Control, 19(4), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv19i4art9
46. Pisano, S., D’Amore, G., Landriani, L., & Lepore, L. (2022). Can a corporate social responsibility committee be utilized to enhance the effectiveness of independent directors? Corporate Ownership & Control, 20(1), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv20i1art18