The selection of articles on shareholder activism

The following selection of papers from our journals has been prepared by the editorial team in order to help our readers and scholars pursuing research in this field find more information devoted to the topic of “shareholder activism”.

Belcredi, M., Bozzi, S., Ciavarella, A., & Novembre, V. (2017). Institutional investors’ activism under concentrated ownership and the role of proxy advisors. Evidence from the Italian say-on-pay. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4art4
Bassen, A., Schiereck, D., & Thamm, C. (2016). Activist shareholders and the duration of supervisory board membership: evidence for the German Aufsichtsra. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(2-3), 521-531. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i2c3p3
Moyo, T., Davies, S. E. H., & Joubert, E. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and organisational performance of a professional football club in South Africa. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-5), 605-613. http:/ /dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c5p8
Raja, K., & Kostyuk, A. (2015). Perspectives and obstacles of the shareholder activism implementation: A comparative analysis of civil and common law systems. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-5), 520-533. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c5p1
De Falco, S. E., Cucari, N., & Sorrentino, E. (2016). Voting dissent and corporate governance structures: The role of say on pay in a comparative analysis. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(4-1), 188-197. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i4c1p12
Kokkinis, A. (2014). Shareholder short-termism in the UK: The kay review and the potential role of corporate law. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(3-1), 166-174. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i3c1p3
Safiullah, Md. (2016). Board governance, ownership structure and financing decisions in emerging market. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(3-2), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i3c2p8
Diez Esteban, J. M. López-de-Foronda, Ó. (2008). Dividends and institutional investor’s activism: pressure resistant or pressure sensitive? Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i1p4
Gnutti, A. H., Martin, J. D, &. Ramsey, J. D. (2014). Predicting corporate voting outcomes for shareholder sponsored proposals. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(1-8), 742-758. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i1c8p7
Bruno, S. (2015). Legal rules, shareholders and corporate governance. The European shareholder rights’ directive and its impact on corporate governance of Italian listed companies: The telecom S.P.A. case. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(2-3), 394-398. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i2c3p4
Kruse, T. A., Suzuki, K. (2009). Has the threat of a takeover improved the management of target firms? An analysis of firms in which M&A consulting, japan’s first hostile bidder, acquired stakes. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv7i2p11
Ong, S. E., Petrova, M., & Spieler, A. C. (2010). Shareholder activism and director retirement plans repeals. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(3-1), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv7i3c1p4
Van der Elst, C. (2011). Shareholder activism in good and bad economic times. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(2), 32- 43. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2sip3
Jansson, A. (2014). No exit!: The logic of defensive shareholder activism. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 10(2), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv10i2art2
Ahmad, M., Ahmed, B. and Badar, M. (2017). Determinants of capital structure and its impact on corporate governance: An emerging market empirical study. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 1(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv1i1p2