Updated collection of papers on Corporate Board performance

The editorial team of publishing house “Virtus Interpress” has updated the collection of papers on Corporate Board performance combined of articles previously published in Corporate Ownership and Control and Corporate Board: role, duties and composition journals.

We hope that this collection will be useful for those scholars pursuing research in the field of Corporate Board performance:

  1. Abdullah, S. N., Zainal Abidin, N. H., Abu Bakar, I. S., & Rahman, A. U. (2016). The appointment process for independent directors in Malaysian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(1-3), 519-531. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1c3p12
  2. Sharif, S. P., & Yeoh, K.K. (2016). The resource provision capability of independent directors in family-controlled, publicly-listed companies in Malaysia. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(4-2), 403-413. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i4c2p11
  3. Chandrakumara, A., & Walte, G. (2015). Role of non-executive directors in implementing non-regulatory codes on corporate governance in SMEs listed in the alternative investment market in the UK: A content analysis. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(1-2), 220-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c2p1
  4. Giovanelli, L., & Rotondo, F. (2015). Who are the independent directors in large Italian banks? Identity, diversity and disclosure [Special issue]. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(4), 871-882. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4csp8
  5. Grove, H., & Clouse, M. (2015). Developing guidelines for independent and competent directors using what we have learned from research and company examples [Special issue]. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(4), 826-837. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4csp3
  6. Sharif, S. P., & Kyid, Y. K. (2014). Independent directors’ resource provision capability in publicly-listed companies in Malaysia. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(3), 113-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i3p8
  7. Mynhardt, R. H. (2013). A model for selecting non-executive directors: The case of South African banks [Special conference issue]. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(3), 51-60. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i3siart4
  8. Ntim, C. G. (2011). The king reports, independent non-executive directors and firm valuation on the Johannesburg stock exchange. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(1-4), 428-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i1c4art2
  9. Chou, S., Yang, H. L., & Tong, J. J. (2011). Do directors’ outside appointments hurt board effectiveness: An analysis under familial dominance in the Taiwan case. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(1-1), 203-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i1c1art8
  10. Khan, A., & Mather, P. (2011). Managerial share ownership and discretionary accruals in Australia: Do independent and executive directors have different incentives? Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(1), 122-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i1art8
  11. Stein, G., & Plaza, S. (2011). The role of the independent director in CEO supervision and turnover. Corporate Ownership & Control, 9(1), 40-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i1art2
  12. Bhabra, H. S., & Li, T. (2011). Independent directors and corporate performance: Evidence from listed firms in China. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(3), 145-169. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i3p11
  13. Johl, S., Jackling, B., & Joshi, M. (2010). Family generation, leadership, and performance: The role of outside directors in Indian family firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(1-6), 646-661. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i1c6p6
  14. Ali Ahmed, H. J. (2010). Impact of independent directors and remuneration committee on firm performance? Evidence from Malaysian capital market. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(1-1), 222-225. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i1c1p6
  15. Phillips, P. J., & Cotter, J. (2010). The technostructure gap the educational qualifications of executive and non-executive directors. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(4), 102-113. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv7i4p7
  16. Chouchene, I. (2010). The determinants of the presence of independent directors in French board companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(3-3), 343-352. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv7i3c3p2
  17. Weiden, K. M., & Mooney, J. (2010). New economy versus old economy firms: The use of stock options and retirement plans for non-executive employees. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(3-1), 159-172. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv7i3c1p1
  18. Chen, C.-W., Lin, J. B., & Yi, B. (2008). Two faces of busy outside directors. Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(2-4), 467-474. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i2c4p5
  19. Yeh, Y.-H., Shu, P.-G., & Su, Y.-H. (2008). The causes of voluntary resignation of independent directors. Corporate Ownership & Control, 5(4), 112-118. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv5i4p10
  20. Muhamad Sori, Z., Abdul Hamid, M. A., Mohd Saad, S. S., & Evans, J. G. (2008). Non-executive directors and audit committee: A study on their authority and effectiveness. Corporate Ownership & Control, 5(2-2), 296-305. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv5i2c2p6
  21. Ntoung, L. A. T., Vila Biglieri, J. E., De Oliveira, S. H. M., Benjamim, M. F., Outman, B. C., & Masárová, E. (2017). The impact of ownership structure on firm performance: The role of chairman and CEO in Portugal. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 13(2), 6-19. http://doi.org/10.22495/cbv13i2art1
  22. Watkins-Fassler, K. (2017). CEOs´ monetary incentives and performance of Mexican firms. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 13(1), 36-46. http://doi.org/10.22495/cbv13i1p4
  23. Zhang, C.-Z., & Zhuo-qin Gao, X. M. (2015). Manipulation effects of managerial discretion on executive-employee pay gap: A comparative study between the senior CEOs and the fresh CEOs. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 11(3), 43-65. http://doi.org/10.22495/cbv11i3art5
  24. Makoni, P. L. (2015). The challenges of “acting” CEOs in state-owned enterprises: The case of South African airways. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 11(3), 16-24. http://doi.org/10.22495/cbv11i3art2
  25. Nulla, Y. M. (2015). Board influence and CEO power to executive compensation system in American SMEs. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 11(2), 132-145. http://doi.org/10.22495/cbv11i2art11
  26. Ahamed, N. (2015). How long a tenure is long enough: CEOs tenure and its impact on firm’s performance. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 11(2), 50-64. http://doi.org/10.22495/cbv11i2art4
  27. Kalyanaraman, L. (2015). Do family CEOs impact firm value? An empirical analysis of Indian family firms. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 11(1), 59-70. http://doi.org/10.22495/cbv11i1art6
  28. Sanford, D. Jr., Ji, Y.-Y., & Oh, W.-Y. (2012). Poison pills and CEOs: The résumé matters. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 8(2), 24-43. http://doi.org/10.22495/cbv8i2art3
  29. Oler, D., Olson, B., & Skousen, C. J. (2009). What effect does CEO power and governance have over acquisitions? Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 5(3), 45-55. http://doi.org/10.22495/cbv5i3art4
  30. Zelechowski, D. D., & Bilimoria, D. (2006). Characteristics of CEOs and corporate boards with women inside directors. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 2(2), 14-21. http://doi.org/10.22495/cbv2i2art2