-
Journal menu

- General information
- Editorial Board
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Journal Policies
- Article Processing Charge
- Order hard copies of the journal (for institutions)
- Order hard copies of the journal (for individuals)
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access Statement
- Statement on the Use of Generative AI
Programming and material defects in AI technologies as bases for civil liability: A study within the scope of Jordanian law and EU legislation
Download This Article
Abeer Hassan Al-Qaisi
, Mohammad Ali Ahmad Alamawi, Ma’en Abdel-rahim Abdel-aziz Juwaihan
, Shadi Meeush D’yab Altarawneh, Sayel Mufleh Al-Momani, Mohammad Rajai Jaber, Ahmad Al-Btoush

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This paper investigates the material characteristics of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies as a legal foundation for the imposition of civil liability for damages pursuant to Jordanian law and European Union (EU) regulations (Rahman et al., 2024; Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, 2024). The study problem entails considering AI as an autonomous entity, despite its reliance on software operating within a physical medium, hence questioning the adequacy of existing legal systems. The study aims to assess the sufficiency of current laws in reflecting material reality and to ascertain whether legal accountability should be attributed to AI systems or to the humans responsible for their design, development, and operation. A descriptive, analytical, and comparative approach is employed to examine relevant legislative texts, ethical frameworks, and current European regulatory instruments. The results show that Jordanian law has a glaring vacuum in that it only has non-binding ethical principles. In contrast, the EU has standards that recognize AI technology as a complicated industrial product that can be held liable for defective products. The study indicates that acknowledging the material essence of AI establishes a more cohesive and legally robust framework for civil responsibility, advocating for legislative reform in Jordan in accordance with recent European advancements.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Civil Liability, Material Nature, Jordanian Legislation, European Union Legislation
Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — A.H.A.-Q.; Methodology — A.H.A.-Q. and S.M.D.A.; Formal Analysis — A.H.A.-Q. and M.A.A.J.; Validation — M.A.A.A., S.M.D.A., and M.R.J.; Data Curation — M.A.A.J.; Investigation — M.A.A.J. and S.M.D.A.; Resources — S.M.A.-M. and A.A.-B.; Writing — Original Draft — A.H.A.-Q.; Writing — Review & Editing — M.A.A.A., M.R.J., and A.A.-B.; Supervision — M.A.A.A., S.M.D.A., and M.R.J.; Project Administration — S.M.A.-M. and M.R.J.
Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
JEL Classification: K13, K23, K24, L51, O33
Received: 15.09.2025
Revised: 17.12.2025; 07.01.2026
Accepted: 09.02.2026
Published online: 12.02.2026
How to cite this paper: Al-Qaisi, A. H., Alamawi, M. A. A., Juwaihan, M. A. A., Altarawneh, S. M. D., Al-Momani, S. M., Jaber, M. R., & Al-Btoush, A. (2026). Programming and material defects in AI technologies as bases for civil liability: A study within the scope of Jordanian law and EU legislation. Corporate Law & Governance Review, 8(1), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv8i1p13
















