
-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Journal Policies
- Article Processing Charge
- Order hard copies of the journal (for institutions)
- Order hard copies of the journal (for individuals)
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access Statement
- Statement on the Use of Generative AI
Securities law transition and value relevance: Evidence from China
Download This Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This research investigates the impact of securities law transition on the value relevance of earnings and book value. This research adopts the Ohlson (1995) model to measure the value relevance. Using the panel data of 2,116 Chinese listed companies from 2015 to 2022, we analyze the impact of the Chinese securities law amendment (which happened in 2019) on the value relevance. The results reveal that the value relevance of earnings increased after the securities law amendment, while the value relevance of the book value decreased during the same period. These results indicate that under a stricter securities law, investors put more emphasis on the earnings than the book value. This research contributes to existing literature (Choi et al., 2018; Oz & Yelkenci, 2018) by providing insights into the interplay between the legal environment and market reaction to accounting information. These insights aid stakeholders in comprehending the effects of securities law transition on value relevance. This research also provides empirical evidence to the lawmakers and aids in formulating more effective regulatory strategies. By grounding regulatory decisions in empirical findings, lawmakers can ensure that regulations are evidence-based and aligned with market dynamics.
Keywords: Value Relevance, Legal Environment, Securities Law, Earnings Management
Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — J.Y.; Methodology — J.Y.; Validation — J.Y.; Formal Analysis — J.Y.; Investigation — J.Y.; Resources — J.Y.; Data Curation — J.Y.; Writing — Original Draft — J.Y.; Writing — Editing & Review — J.Y.; Supervision — M.S.H. and H.M.N.
Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
JEL Classification: G40, F65, K22
Received: 16.10.2024
Revised: 24.01.2025; 15.04.2025
Accepted: 22.04.2025
Published online: 24.04.2025
How to cite this paper: Yu, J., Hassan, M. S., & Md Nor, H. (2025). Securities law transition and value relevance: Evidence from China. Corporate Law & Governance Review, 7(2), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv7i2p6