-
Journal menu

- General information
- Editorial Board
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Journal Policies
- Article Processing Charge
- Order hard copies of the journal (for institutions)
- Order hard copies of the journal (for individuals)
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access Statement
- Statement on the Use of Generative AI
The legal basis for returning the undue payment: A law doctrine analysis
Download This Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This study critically examines the doctrinal foundations and normative justifications of the obligation to return an undue payment under the Saudi Civil Transactions Law (CTL) (2023). It contends that the CTL’s provisions on undue payment invoke a complex interplay between classical Sharīʿah-inflected norms and modern civil law doctrines of restitution and enrichment, a tension foregrounded in comparative scholarship (Davrados, 2023). Adopting a descriptive-analytical legal methodology, the article interrogates the role of intent — both of the payer and the recipient — in delineating liability for repayment and in determining when a transaction, although formally valid, becomes undue by reason of lacking a juridical basis. The analysis differentiates undue payment from other restitutionary mechanisms, demonstrating that even payments made in good faith may trigger an obligation of return when the underlying legal cause fails (Corletto, 2024). The findings reveal a persistent doctrinal and pedagogical gap in Saudi legal education and scholarship regarding undue payment, and they support targeted legislative refinement and curricular reform to strengthen the practical enforceability of CTL rules and align Saudi civil law with advanced comparative standards.
Keywords: Undue Payment, Restitution, Unjust Enrichment, Civil Transactions Law, Sharīʿah Principles, Comparative Private Law
Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — S.M.A. and A.S.A.A.-M.; Methodology — S.M.A. and A.S.A.A.-M.; Formal analysis — S.M.A. and A.S.A.A.-M.; Investigation — S.M.A. and A.S.A.A.-M.; Writing — Original Draft — S.M.A. and A.S.A.A.-M.; Writing — Review & Editing — S.M.A. and A.S.A.A.-M.
Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
JEL Classification: K4, K15, K19
Received: 24.06.2025
Revised: 04.11.2025; 03.12.2025
Accepted: 08.12.2025
Published online: 10.12.2025
How to cite this paper: Alhamed, S. M., & Al-Marri, A. S. A. (2025). The legal basis for returning the undue payment: A law doctrine analysis. Corporate Law & Governance Review, 7(4), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv7i4p6
















