
-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Journal Policies
- Article Processing Charge
- Order hard copies of the journal (for institutions)
- Order hard copies of the journal (for individuals)
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access Statement
Unjust enrichment and restitution assessment in Saudi civil law
Download This Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This study aims to clarify the theory of unjust enrichment as an independent source of obligation when filing a case for unjust enrichment, with particular focus on its incorporation into the new Saudi Civil Transactional Law. Using a descriptive methodology, the study delineates for Saudi lawyers, legal practitioners, and law students a framework for identifying incidents of unjust enrichment and applicable methods of restitution. It charts the evolution of the theory, defines the conditions under which unjust enrichment arises, and categorizes its various forms, which can involve money, services, or other benefits. It clarifies the procedural requirements when submitting an unjust enrichment claim to the courts and explains how restitution is assessed. By addressing a critical gap in the literature, this study enhances understanding of how unjust enrichment operates within Saudi civil law, which is rooted in Shariah principles. Its findings offer a detailed analysis of its theoretical basis and its distinction from related doctrines such as undue payment. Based on this analysis, it calls for stronger legal education on unjust enrichment and legislative reforms, including a dedicated restitution law, clearer assessment criteria, a shorter statute of limitations, and penalties for unreported cases.
Keywords: Unjust Enrichment, Restitution, Civil Law, Source of Obligation, Impoverishment, Litigation, Assessment
Authors’ individual contribution: The Author is responsible for all the contributions to the paper according to CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) standards.
Declaration of conflicting interests: The Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
JEL Classification: K150, K410, K390
Received: 18.10.2024
Revised: 09.12.2024; 26.02.2025; 24.04.2025
Accepted: 28.04.2025
Published online: 02.05.2025
How to cite this paper: Al-Marri, A. S. A. (2025). Unjust enrichment and restitution assessment in Saudi civil law. Corporate Law & Governance Review, 7(2), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv7i2p7