Employee performance: The role of operational work tools toward productivity

Download This Article

Askar Taliang ORCID logo, Syamsu Rijal ORCID logo, Risma Niswaty ORCID logo, Herman ORCID logo, Sitti Hardiyanti Arhas ORCID logo

https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i3siart1

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The success or development of an agency is determined by its human resources. Organizations or agencies need employee development programs because employee development activities are very important for employee progress because it involves activities and activities carried out by employees, this shows that organizations or agencies care about their employees and expect employees to develop. This study aims to examine the effect of management work tools on work productivity, either directly or through productivity and accountability. To examine the effect of operational work tools on work productivity, either directly or through productivity and accountability. The data collection technique used is a questionnaire. Analysis of the data used is path analysis using the SmartPLS application. Of the 6 hypotheses proposed, only 2 hypotheses were accepted, namely operational work tools and a significant positive effect on employee performance. Operational work tools have a positive and significant effect on employee performance through productivity. This gives an indication that the availability of operational work tools helps employees improve performance. Thus, the role of the leadership is expected to provide the maximum possible facilities.

Keywords: Management Work Tools, Operational Work Tools, Productivity, Accountability, Employee Performance

Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — A.T., S.R., R.N., H., and S.H.A.; Methodology — A.T., S.R., R.N., H., and S.H.A.; Formal Analysis — A.T., S.R., R.N., H., and S.H.A.; Investigation — A.T., S.R., R.N., H., and S.H.A.; Resources — A.T., S.R., R.N., H., and S.H.A.; Data Curation — A.T., S.R., R.N., H., and S.H.A.; Writing — Original Draft — A.T., S.R., R.N., H., and S.H.A.; Writing — Review & Editing — A.T., S.R., R.N., H., and S.H.A.; Visualization — A.T., S.R., R.N., H., and S.H.A.; Project Administration — A.T., S.R., R.N., H., and S.H.A.

Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

JEL Classification: J24, J53, H83

Received: 03.09.2022
Accepted: 21.08.2023
Published online: 23.08.2023

How to cite this paper: Taliang, A., Rijal, S., Niswaty, R., Herman, & Arhas, S. H. (2023). Employee performance: The role of operational work tools toward productivity [Special issue]. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 12(3), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i3siart1