Provincial government agency public services: An analysis of their internal competency, internal and external environment factors

Download This Article

Wiwat Thanapaet ORCID logo, Watcharin Sutthisai ORCID logo, Sitthiporn Soonthorn ORCID logo, Ratchanida Saiyaros ORCID logo, Sathitkoon Boonruan ORCID logo

https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i2art12

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Public services (PS) in modern societies have become increasingly difficult to keep up with, creating a strain on governments with limited budgets. As a result, new ways of delivering public value must be sought. In order to better understand the factors that influence public services of the Thai provincial government agency public services (PGAPS), the authors conducted a stratified random sample survey of 400 individuals in a rural province of Northern Thailand in 2021. The latent variable path analysis used LISREL 9.10, with the results showing that internal competency factors (ICF) were ranked as very strong, external environment factors (EEF) as strong, and internal environment factors (IEF) as weak. All four hypotheses were also supported, with an individual’s personal and educational factors having a significant effect on PGAPS. The authors suggest that gender could be used to limit corruption’s influence and should be explored in greater detail in further studies. Effective PS delivery requires good governance, community stakeholder involvement, and cross-organizational collective leadership. Good governance should also enhance economic, social, and political development values. Additionally, this study provides valuable insights for municipalities to improve their implementation processes, increase transparency, and ensure fiscal responsibility (OECD & ADB, 2019).

Keywords: Co-Production, Ethics, Governance, Municipalities, Public Services, Thailand

Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — W.T., W.S., S.S., and R.S.; Methodology — W.T., W.S., S.S., and R.S.; Software — W.T. and W.S.; Validation — W.T., W.S., R.S., and S.B.; Formal Analysis — W.T., R.S., and S.B.; Investigation — S.S., R.S., and S.B.; Resources — W.T., R.S., and S.B.; Data Curation — W.T. and R.S.; Writing — Original Draft — W.T. and R.S.; Writing — Review & Editing — W.T., W.S., and R.S.; Visualization — W.T. and W.S.; Supervision — W.S., S.S., and R.S.; Project Administration — W.T., W.S., S.S., and R.S.

Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

JEL Classification: D25, O19, Q01, Q25, Q56

Received: 30.10.2022
Accepted: 12.05.2023
Published online: 16.05.2023

How to cite this paper: Thanapaet, W., Sutthisai, W., Soonthorn, S., Saiyaros, R., & Boonruan, S. (2023). Provincial government agency public services: An analysis of their internal competency, internal and external environment factors. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 12(2), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i2art12