-
Journal menu

- General information
- Editorial Board
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Journal policies
- Article Processing Charge
- Order hard copies of the journal (for institutions)
- Order hard copies of the journal (for individuals)
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access Statement
- Statement on the Use of Generative AI
The role of the 4Es in driving business performance and competitive advantage for cosmetic industry SMEs in emerging economies
Download This Article
Kris Jangjarat
, Yarnaphat Shaengchart
, Pongsakorn Limna
, Supakorn Suradinkura
, Nalinpat Bhumpenpein

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are vital engines of economic development, innovation, and employment, particularly in emerging economies where structural constraints intensify competitive pressures (Fajarika et al., 2024; Keelson et al., 2024). Within this landscape, the cosmetics industry has emerged as a dynamic sector, driven by rising consumer demand, digital platforms, and cultural emphasis on personal aesthetics (Jinachai et al., 2016; Shin, 2024). This study explores the role of the 4Es (Experience, Exchange, Everyplace, and Evangelism) marketing framework in shaping business performance and competitive advantage among cosmetic SMEs in Thailand. Using a qualitative design with semi-structured interviews and content analysis, the findings demonstrate that cultural storytelling, ethical value exchanges, omnichannel accessibility, and customer-driven advocacy reinforce both financial outcomes, such as sales growth and export expansion, and non-financial outcomes, including brand trust, loyalty, and equity. The study advances marketing scholarship by highlighting the 4Es as a consumer-centric orientation that supports resilience and sustainable competitiveness in resource-constrained environments.
Keywords: Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, SMEs, Cosmetics Industry, 4Es Marketing Framework, Business Performance, Competitive Advantage
Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — K.J., Y.S., and P.L.; Methodology — K.J., Y.S., and P.L.; Validation — K.J., Y.S., and P.L.; Formal Analysis — K.J., Y.S., and P.L.; Investigation — K.J., Y.S., P.L., and S.S.; Resources — K.J., Y.S., P.L., S.S., and N.B.; Data Curation — K.J., Y.S., and P.L.; Writing — Original Draft — K.J., Y.S., P.L., S.S., and N.B.; Writing — Review & Editing — K.J., Y.S., and P.L.; Visualization — K.J., Y.S., P.L., S.S., and N.B.; Supervision — Y.S., P.L., and N.B.; Project Administration — K.J., Y.S., and P.L.
Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
JEL Classification: L26, L81, M21, M31, O53
Received: 15.11.2025
Revised: 05.12.2025; 25.12.2025
Accepted: 16.01.2026
Published online: 20.01.2026
How to cite this paper: Jangjarat, K., Shaengchart, Y., Limna, P., Suradinkura, S., & Bhumpenpein, N. (2026). The role of the 4Es in driving business performance and competitive advantage for cosmetic industry SMEs in emerging economies. Business Performance Review, 4(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.22495/bprv4i1p3
















