
-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board and External Reviewers
- Journal Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Article processing charge
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access statement
- Order hard copies of the journal
- 50 most cited papers in the journal
AGENCY VS. STEWARDSHIP: PERFORMANCE, STRATEGIC FLEXIBILITY AND RISK
Download This ArticleAbstract
With taxpayers subsidizing the survival of publicly traded firms, questions of corporate governance, including the steward versus agency design of the firm, are now public policy issues. We use publicly traded insurance firms in the United States to study the value and risk relationship of agency versus stewardship firms. We find that stewardship and agency firms have different timing-related performance perspectives, have different degrees of strategic flexibility, and manage short term, or operational risk, and longer term risk differently. Our findings are consistent with the predictions of corporate governance theory.
Keywords: Agency, Stewardship, Performance, Strategy, Risk
How to cite this paper: Scordis, N., Barrese, J. (2010). Agency vs. stewardship: performance, strategic flexibility and risk. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(3-2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv7i3c2p1