-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board and External Reviewers
- Journal Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Article processing charge
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access statement
- Order hard copies of the journal
- 50 most cited papers in the journal
Do publicly traded companies engage in opinion shopping after receiving a going concern audit opinion? Evidence from U.S. firms in the post-SOX era
Download This Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Audit opinion shopping continues to be of significant interest to regulators and is also of interest to investors and the public. This study examines whether in the post-SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act) era, publicly traded companies in the U.S. engage in the act of shopping for audit opinions after receiving a going concern opinion (GCO). We further examine whether auditor firm size (Big 4 versus non-Big 4) affects such activities. Using data from Compustat and Audit Analytics we identify financially distressed publicly-held U.S. firms between 2004 and 2015. Adopting the framework developed by Lennox (2000), we examine the difference in the probabilities between auditor switching and no-switching scenarios. We find evidence that public companies in the U.S. who receive GCOs are successful in shopping for clean audit opinions in a subsequent period. We also find that audit opinion shopping activities are more common among public companies who switch to non-Big 4 auditors as opposed to those who switch to Big 4 auditors. Our paper fills the gap in the literature by examining whether, in the post-SOX era, publicly-held firms in the U.S. engage in the act of shopping for audit opinions, after receiving a GCO.
Keywords: Going Concern Opinion, Audit Opinion Shopping, Big 4, Non-Big 4
Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — V.D.; Methodology — V.D.; Formal analysis — V.D.; Investigation — R.D.; Date Curation — V.D.; Writing — Original Draft — R.D.; Writing — Review & Editing — L.A.K. and J.Y.D.; Visualization — J.Y.D.; Supervision — L.A.K.; Project Administration — L.A.K.
Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
JEL Classification: M42, M48, G34
Received: 06.06.2023
Accepted: 24.01.2024
Published online: 26.01.2024
How to cite this paper: Desai, V., Kidwell, L. A., Davidyan, J. Y., & Desai, R. (2024). Do publicly traded companies engage in opinion shopping after receiving a going concern audit opinion? Evidence from U.S. firms in the post-SOX era. Corporate Ownership & Control, 21(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv21i1art2