data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/106a9/106a9eb3a5bb3bf8d1214b8d082bf2b68f5df593" alt=""
-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board and External Reviewers
- Journal Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Article processing charge
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access statement
- Order hard copies of the journal
- 50 most cited papers in the journal
EVIDENCE ON BOARD SIZE AND INFORMATION ASYMMETRY: A CAPITAL MARKETS PERSPECTIVE
Download This ArticleAbstract
We examine the relation of board size with market liquidity and adverse selection costs using a sample of Fortune 200 companies. After controlling for firm specifics, equity characteristics, and ratio of insiders, we find a direct relation between board size and equity market liquidity. Our findings indicate that board size is positively and significantly related to dollar depth but has no impact on bid-ask spreads. Furthermore, using the adverse selection component of the bid-ask spread as a proxy for transparency, we find that larger boards reduce information asymmetries, but the ratio of insiders to total board members has no impact on informational asymmetries.
Keywords: Board Size, Corporate Governance, Market Liquidity, Information Asymmetry
How to cite this paper: Flaherty, S., Li, J., & Small, K. (2007). Evidence on board size and information asymmetry: A capital markets perspective. Corporate Ownership & Control, 4(2-2), 248-256. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv4i2c2p1