
-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board and External Reviewers
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Journal Policies
- Order hard copies of the journal (for institutions)
- Order hard copies of the journal (for individuals)
- Article Processing Charge
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access Statement
- Statement on the Use of Generative AI
Financial performance and social performance: Does the board-level sustainability function matter?
Download This Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between corporate financial performance (CFP) and corporate social performance (CSP), exploring any inherent non-linearities (Jahmane & Gaies, 2020). Further, it investigates whether a formal ethics function on the board moderates this relationship. Literature suggests sustainability committees encourage investment in corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Velte, 2023; Velte & Stawinoga, 2020). Thus, the CSP should be higher and sustained for firms with such structures on the board. Using data from 239 companies across the largest stock markets in West, East, and Southern Africa (2014–2018), the study applies generalized linear regression models that are fitted to the data with CSP score as the outcome variable, and return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) as independent variables. Polynomial terms are introduced to capture non-linearity, and the ethics function on the board is introduced as an interaction term. Findings reveal a non-linear relationship between CFP and CSP, where CSP increases with CFP but declines after a threshold. Furthermore, firms with a board-level ethics function demonstrate stronger CSP engagement, suggesting that ethical oversight influences corporate decision-making on social initiatives. The study underscores the vital role of sustainability committees in maintaining CSP as a strategic priority.
Keywords: Corporate Financial Performance, Corporate Social Performance, Slack Resources Theory, Sub-Saharan Africa, Sustainability Committee
Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — A.P.-Y.; Validation — A.P.-Y.; Formal Analysis — A.P.-Y.; Data Curation — A.P.-Y.; Writing — Original Draft — A.P.-Y.; Writing — Review & Editing — E.A.-S. and A.S.A.; Visualization — A.P.-Y.
Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
JEL Classification: G30, L25, M14, O55, Q56
Received: 30.12.2024
Revised: 17.03.2025; 27.06.2025
Accepted: 07.07.2025
Published online: 10.07.2025
How to cite this paper: Peprah-Yeboah, A., Akwaa-Sekyi, E. K., & Atchulo, A. S. (2025). Financial performance and social performance: Does the board-level sustainability function matter? Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 9(3), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv9i3p6