-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board and External Reviewers
- Journal Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Article processing charge
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access statement
- Order hard copies of the journal
- 50 most cited papers in the journal
IS IT BETTER TO CHANGE TOP MANAGEMENT AFTER A MERGER OR ACQUISITION?
Download This ArticleAbstract
In this paper, we analyzed the relationship between turnover of top management and performance of listed companies after takeover. We made a hypothesis that after equity change of listed corporations, the turnover of top management improved the performance of these corporations. We chose the sample of listed corporations in Shenzhen and Shanghai security exchanges which had equity change, and we used the assessment of the “Operating Performance” Methodology to analyze the performance of these listed corporations empirically. We find that the company which had turnover of top management after the corporate control right changed, had significant performance improvement, and had better performance than the company which had not had turnover of top management after the corporate control right changed.
Keywords: Corporate Control, Operating Performance, Top Management turnover
How to cite this paper: Chen, J., & Xi, Y. (2008). Is it better to change top management after a merger or acquisition? Corporate Ownership & Control, 5(3), 62-66. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv5i3p7