POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE VOTING PREMIUM: WHAT HAPPENED TO PRIVATE BENEFITS IN ITALY?

Download This Article

Abstract

A large body of research deals with voting premium as a proxy of private benefit of control. Almost all of them find positive voting premium, in particular in Italy. Therefore appears interesting to ask what is the current status of private benefits of control in Italy in the last decade (2007-2017). Surprisingly, we show three major findings: i) reduction of non-voting share in the Italian scenario; ii) prevalence of negative voting rights premium more than positive ones, thus conflicting with the assumption and the observations by other researchers; iii) limits of the voting premium method. Our aim is that this study, despite its limitations, may encourage further researches focused on the analysis of the improvement and the change in the Italian corporate governance. The article points out that interesting evidence already exists, although still much remains to do in the future.

Keywords: Private Benefit, Voting Premium, Corporate Governance, Corporate Control, Control Premium, Private Cost, Italian Context

JEL Classification: G34

Received: 30.11.2017

Accepted: 26.02.2018

Published online: 26.03.2018

How to cite this paper: Sancetta, G., Cucari, N., & Esposito De Falco, S. (2018). Positive or negative voting premium: What happened to private benefits in Italy? Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(3), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i3art8