-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board and External Reviewers
- Journal Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Article processing charge
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access statement
- Order hard copies of the journal
- 50 most cited papers in the journal
Recent challenges of LBOs in Italy and institutional insights: The devil lies in the details
Download This Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This study highlights recent institutional challenges faced by Private equity (PE) investors in Italy. These challenges increased the debate on the admissibility of LBOs, especially with reference to the actual nature of the debt underlying LBOs and the deductibility of the related interest payments. Despite the enactment of the 2004 corporate governance reform, which legalized LBOs under specific conditions, and the introduction of the European AIFM Directive (2011/61/EU), the doubts on the admissibility of LBOs have not been fully resolved. Up until recently, the Italian Tax Authority continued to challenge LBOs by interpreting them as tools fraudulently adopted by PE investors to elude the law and evade taxes. As a result, PE investors had to face a number of fiscal challenges and sanctions, which added more uncertainty to the legal admissibility of LBOs in Italy. Recently, new fiscal guidelines and jurisprudence finally changed this perspective, confirming the legitimacy of LBOs.
Keywords: Buyouts, Private Equity, Regulation, AIFMD, Tax Treatment
Authors’ individual contribution: The author is responsible for all the contributions to the paper according to CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) standards.
JEL Classification: G23, G24, G28, K22, K34
Received: 03.12.2019
Accepted: 09.01.2020
Published online: 10.01.2020
How to cite this paper: Zambelli, S. (2019). Recent challenges of LBOs in Italy and institutional insights: The devil lies in the details [Special issue]. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(1), 360-367. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i1siart16