Regulation of intergovernmental disputes: The aviation industry case study
Download This Article
Muhammad Saleh 
, Muhammad Wildan, Gemuh Surya Wahyudi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The main problem in this paper is a dispute between the government of West Nusa Tenggara Province (NTB) Indonesia, and the government of Central Lombok Regency about the fight to name the airport. This paper aims to explain that the struggle for the name of Lombok International Airport (BIL) to become Zainuddin Abdul Madjid International Airport (BIZAM) in Lombok has become a dispute between Levels 1 and 2 local governments. The form of conflict is that the NTB Level 1 local government wants an airport called BIZAM, while the Central Lombok Level 2 regional government wants BIL. This paper uses in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation methods. The results of this paper show that the conflict occurs because there are planned elements carried out by Levels 1 and 2 local governments that are indirectly affiliated with one particular religious or social group in the fight for airport naming. For this reason, this article implies that the conflict occurs solely because it wants to maintain the identity and for the sake of the self-esteem of each group or socio-religious organization.
Keywords: Dispute, International Airport, Pride, Resolution
Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — M.S.; Methodology — M.S. and M.W.; Validation — M.S. and G.S.W.; Formal Analysis — M.S. and M.W.; Investigation — M.S.; Writing — Original Draft — M.S.; Writing — Review & Editing — G.S.W.; Visualization — M.W. and G.S.W.
Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
JEL Classification: H77, K19, Z13
Received: 25.04.2023
Accepted: 09.04.2024
Published online: 11.04.2024
How to cite this paper: Saleh, M., Wildan, M., & Wahyudi, G. S. (2024). Regulation of intergovernmental disputes: The aviation industry case study. Corporate & Business Strategy Review, 5(2), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv5i2art1
