Supervisory sanctions, ESG practices, and banks’ reputation: A market performance analysis of sanctioned banks

Download This Article

Fabiomassimo Mango ORCID logo, Pina Murè ORCID logo, Mavie Cardi ORCID logo, Cosimo Paccione ORCID logo, Lucilla Bittucci ORCID logo

https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv20i3siart9

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices on banks’ reputation and market performance. In particular, we aim to analyse whether banks adopting ESG-compliant practices can reduce their reputational damage due to financial sanctions and increase their market performance. In order to demonstrate the effect of banks’ ESG practices in reducing reputational damage due to financial penalties imposed by supervisors for breaches of regulatory requirements, we analyze a sample of 21 banks — selected because of the availability of information on sanctions imposed by the supervisory authorities — by applying a pre-selection model based on the trend of historical returns. With reference to the selected sample, we verify the percentage of securities characterized by different levels of sanctions and different ESG scores. Overall, we find that ESG aspects have a positive impact on stock performance, although higher ESG scores do not, per se, mean a lower probability of sanctions. Differing from previous research, our study, by focusing on financial sanctions, provides useful insights concerning the ESG impact on both market performance and reputational aspects.

Keywords: Supervisory Sanctions, ESG Scores, Portfolio Analysis, Financial Markets, Market Performance

Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — F.M., P.M., M.C., and C.P.; Methodology — F.M. and C.P.; Software — F.M. and C.P.; Validation — F.M., M.C., and L.B.; Formal Analysis — F.M. and C.P.; Investigation — P.M., M.C., and C.P.; Resources — P.M.; Data Curation — C.P.; Writing — Original Draft — P.M., M.C., and C.P.; Writing — Review & Editing — F.M., M.C., C.P., and L.B.; Supervision — F.M., P.M., and M.C.; Project Administration — F.M.

Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

JEL Classification: G1, G2, G3, G4

Received: 15.05.2023
Accepted: 25.07.2023
Published online: 27.07.2023

How to cite this paper: Mango, F., Murè, P., Cardi, M., Paccione, C., & Bittucci, L. (2023). Supervisory sanctions, ESG practices, and banks’ reputation: A market performance analysis of sanctioned banks [Special issue]. Corporate Ownership & Control, 20(3), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv20i3siart9