![](local/cache-vignettes/L300xH470/rubon9-59d38.jpg?1724744805)
-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board and External Reviewers
- Journal Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Article processing charge
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access statement
- Order hard copies of the journal
- 50 most cited papers in the journal
THE EFFECT OF TAKEOVER DEFENSES ON LONG TERM AND SHORT TERM ANALYSTS’ EARNINGS FORECASTS: THE CASE OF POISON PILLS
Download This ArticleThomas A. Turk, Jeremy Goh, Candace E. Ybarra
Abstract
This study examined the effect of poison pill adoption on long term and short earnings forecasts by security analysts. Our results provide no evidence of significant revisions in one-year or five-year earnings forecasts following the adoption of poison pills. We do find evidence, however, that firms adopt poison pills following a period of significant negative revisions in earnings forecasts. Our results suggest that poison pill adoptions may be a response to downward revisions in earnings forecasts.
Keywords: Takeover Defenses, Earnings Forecasts
How to cite this paper: Turk, T. A., Goh, J., & Ybarra, C. E. (2007). The effect of takeover defenses on long term and short term analysts’ earnings forecasts: The case of poison pills. Corporate Ownership & Control, 4(4), 140-144. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv4i4p11