THE EFFICIENCY OF THE ITALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE: MARKET REACTION FOLLOWING CHANGES IN RECOMMENDATIONS

Download This Article

Enrico Maria Cervellati ORCID logo, Antonio Carlo Francesco Della Bina ORCID logo, Pierpaolo Pattitoni ORCID logo

https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv5i2c4p5

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to examine the market reaction to the recommendation changes issued by financial analysts. We study the peculiar case of Italy where analysts have to send their reports to the Stock Exchange Commission and the Stock Exchange the same day they give it to their clients. Reports are available on the Stock Exchange website. Our dataset includes about 5,200 reports issued on the 117 IPO firms that went public on the Italian Stock market between 1st January 1998 and 31st December 2003. We calculate abnormal returns and abnormal volumes associated with the dissemination of the reports and perform two short-term event studies: the first associated with the “report date”, the second one with regard to the “public access date”, i.e. when the report is freely and publicly available on the Stock Exchange website.
The event study related to the public access date show very different results. We do not find statistically significant average abnormal returns around this date, indicating that the market efficiently does not react to the mere publication of the report on the Stock Exchange website, since prices already included the effect of the recommendation change at the report date, i.e. when the new information was given to analyst’s private clients. It remains to be investigated if the abnormal returns before the report date are due to the effect of news different from the recommendation change or if they show a violation of the Italian regulation.

Keywords: Analysts, Recommendation Changes, Market Efficiency, Short-Term Event Study

How to cite this paper: Cervellati, E. M., Della Bina, A. C. F., & Pattitoni, P. (2008). The efficiency of the Italian stock exchange: market reaction following changes in recommendations [Special issue]. Corporate Ownership & Control, 5(2-4), 434-448. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv5i2c4p5