The backlash against environmental, social, and governance in the United States: A resource-based view

Download This Article

Candace E. Ybarra, Thomas A. Turk ORCID logo

https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv9i3sip7

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

While interest in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investments and initiatives has remained strong in Europe, it has collapsed in the United States (U.S.). This paper argues that the reason for the backlash is that most ESG investments lack the potential to sustain a competitive advantage and, consequently, have fallen under legal and political attack. We review the literature on the relationship between ESG and corporate financial performance (CFP) and conclude that the results are inconsistent and, in some cases, indicate a negative relationship. The purpose of this paper is to identify the source of the inconsistency and introduce a framework for evaluating ESG initiatives. We describe several approaches to ESG, including “greenwashing”, “borrowed virtue”, and “bureaucratic ESG”, and contrast these with “strategic ESG”. We rely on the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm (Barney, 1991, 2018) to develop the circumstances under which corporate ESG programs have the potential to sustain a competitive advantage and qualify as “strategic ESG”. We conclude that ESG investments that are imitable cannot provide a basis for sustainable competitive advantage. Only by leveraging valuable, rare, imperfectly imitable, and non-substitutable resources can an ESG initiative sustain a competitive advantage and superior financial performance.

Keywords: ESG, Competitive Advantage, Corporate Governance, Resource-Based View, Stakeholder Theory

Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — C.E.Y. and T.A.T.; Methodology — C.E.Y. and T.A.T.; Writing — Original Draft — C.E.Y. and T.A.T.; Writing — Review & Editing — C.E.Y. and T.A.T.

Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

JEL Classification: G32, K22, M14

Received: 01.03.2025
Revised: 25.06.2025; 11.07.2025; 24.09.2025
Accepted: 06.10.2025
Published online: 09.10.2025

How to cite this paper: Ybarra, C. E., & Turk, T. A. (2025). The backlash against environmental, social, and governance in the United States: A resource-based view [Special issue]. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 9(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv9i3sip7