Transformational leadership strategy as a driving force to engagement of workers: Empirical study in the banking system

Download This Article

Wasib Bin Latif ORCID logo, Ida Md Yasin ORCID logo, Mohammad Bin Amin ORCID logo, Jewel Kumar Roy ORCID logo, Md. Atikur Rahaman ORCID logo, Md. Kamal Hossain ORCID logo

https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv7i1art22

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This paper explores the hypothesis that transformational leadership strategy (TLS) is related to employee engagement in the branch-banking setting of a developing economy. Based on a quantitative survey of bank managers and employees (matched pairs; n = 61) and the available measures, reliability and validity have been measured, and the hypothesized TLS-engagement path has been tested through regression. Although there are recent studies and reviews that usually indicate positive links between TLS and engagement (e.g., meta- and narrative syntheses) (Bakker et al., 2023; Grah et al., 2024), our findings indicate a weak, statistically insignificant effect. The result indicates that leadership can be less motivated in banking due to contextual contingencies, including reward systems, legacy processes, or culture. We present hypotheses to apply to the job demands-resources (JD-R) theory, and in this case, leadership as a job resource might not be effective without other resources. We provide some steps that banks should take to balance leadership development with job redesign and incentives. We end with restrictions (convenience sampling, cross-sectional design) and future research (longitudinal and multi-level design and studies in other industries). Such insights provide a valuable boundary condition to other existing studies of TLS-engagement in other industries and different regions (Decuypere & Schaufeli, 2021; Bakker et al., 2023; Grah et al., 2024).

Keywords: Transformational Leadership, Employee Engagement, Banking Sector, JD-R Theory, Organizational Behavior

Authors’ individual contribution: Conceptualization — W.B.L., I.M.Y., M.B.A., and M.K.H.; Methodology — W.B.L., I.M.Y., M.B.A., J.K.R., and M.K.H.; Data Curation — W.B.L., I.M.Y., M.B.A., J.K.R., and M.K.H.; Writing — Original Draft — W.B.L., M.B.A., and M.K.H.; Writing — Review & Editing — I.M.Y., J.K.R., M.A.R., and M.K.H.; Funding Acquisition — W.B.L., M.B.A., J.K.R., M.A.R., and M.K.H.

Declaration of conflicting interests: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

JEL Classification: D23, G21, J24, M12

Received: 26.06.2025
Revised: 18.09.2025; 16.10.2025; 15.01.2026
Accepted: 31.01.2026
Published online: 03.02.2026

How to cite this paper: Latif, W. B., Yasin, I. M., Amin, M. B., Roy, J. K., Rahaman, M. A., & Hossain, M. K. (2026). Transformational leadership strategy as a driving force to engagement of workers: Empirical study in the banking system. Corporate and Business Strategy Review, 7(1), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv7i1art22