data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/106a9/106a9eb3a5bb3bf8d1214b8d082bf2b68f5df593" alt=""
-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board and External Reviewers
- Journal Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Article processing charge
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access statement
- Order hard copies of the journal
- 50 most cited papers in the journal
WHICH ANTI-TAKEOVER DEVICES AFFECT FIRM VALUE?
Download This ArticleWilliam Bosworth
Abstract
This research is a two-stage, cross sectional analysis that finds evidence that nine antitakeover defenses (ATDs) are associated with lower firm value in terms of Tobin’s Q. Of the nine, six are limits on shareholder rights such as staggered boards. The other four have the potential of increasing the cost of a takeover such as pension parachutes that prohibit successor firms from using pension surpluses to finance the takeover. Six ATDs, such as anti-greenmail provisions, are associated with higher firm values.
Keywords: Antitakeover Provisions, Tobin’s Q, Agency Costs
How to cite this paper: Bosworth, W. (2005). Which anti-takeover devices affect firm value? Corporate Ownership & Control, 2(3), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv2i3p7