DIRECTOR REMUNERATION, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND PERFORMANCE: A COMPARISON BETWEEN GOVERNMENT LINKED COMPANIES VS NON GOVERNMENT LINKED COMPANIES

Download This Article

Abstract

This study has examined the relationship between director’s remuneration, corporate governance structure and performance of a sample of 150 companies listed on the Bursa Malaysia from year 2008 until 2013. The sample was selected to provide matched-pair of government linked companies (GLCs) and non-government linked companies (non-GLCs), as it was anticipated that these group would have different governance structure, the key difference being government ownership. The result holds even when we control for company specific characteristic such as corporate governance, company size, leverage, director’s remuneration, board size and auditors. This study uses panel based regression model to examine the impact of government control mechanism on company performance using two important measurers. These are accounting based measure proxies by ROA and non-accounting based measures by Tobin’s Q. Statistically significant relationships were found across the groupings and for different performance measures. Findings appear to suggest that there is a significant impact of government ownership on company performance after controlling for company specific characteristics.

Keywords: Director Remuneration; Corporate Governance; Government Ownership

How to cite this paper: Ab Razak, N. H. (2014). Director remuneration, corporate governance and performance: A comparison between government linked companies vs non government linked companies. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 10(2), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv10i2art4