EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF BOARD MEMBERS: A PORTRAIT OF CANADIAN FIRMS

Download This Article

Abstract

The object of this study is to examine how board members’ performance is evaluated and how they are compensated. In the last decade, the board of directors of publicly traded firms has been under strict surveillance by market participants and regulatory bodies. However, although market regulators require the full disclosure of executive and directors’ compensation plans, very few guidelines exist as to how directors should be evaluated. Hence, by thoroughly examining the information disclosed in management proxies, this study shows that publicly traded Canadian firms do indeed evaluate board members’ performance. However, the information disclosed regarding the evaluation of board members is parsimonious and mostly generic. Based on a sample of 173 Canadian firms, our findings also indicate that equity based incentive plans through differed share units (DSUs) are most often used as means to compensate directors.

Keywords: Corporate Governance, Board Members, Performance

How to cite this paper: Berthelot, S., Di Vito, J., & Gagné, V. (2011). Evaluating the performance of board members: A portrait of Canadian firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(3), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i3p7