data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/106a9/106a9eb3a5bb3bf8d1214b8d082bf2b68f5df593" alt=""
-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board and External Reviewers
- Journal Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Article processing charge
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access statement
- Order hard copies of the journal
- 50 most cited papers in the journal
THE COMPOSITION OF FRENCH BOARDS OF DIRECTORS: CHANGES SINCE 1995
Download This ArticleGéraldine Carminatti-Marchand, Mathieu Paquerot
Abstract
The debate over Corporate Governance has been gathering pace in France for several years. Most of the studies on this topic are based on the Anglo-Saxon view. It should nevertheless be noted that French capitalism has peculiarities, which have their origin in its methods of Corporate Governance. Carminatti-Marchand and Paquerot [2000] underline the specificities of the principles of Corporate Governance in France. An essential aspect of this is the nature of the leaders of major companies: more than 50% of the bigger French firms CEOs are graduated from Polytechnic Institute (familiarly referred to as “X”) and of ENA (Ecole Nationale d’Administration). Since 1995, however, the economic and financial environment of French companies has changed considerably. We note today the omnipresence of foreign investors on the Paris Stock Exchange. That presence alters the rules of Corporate Governance and gives us reason to believe that a movement of convergence towards the directors and managers who are graduates of ENA and/or Polytechnic? The results of the study reveal significant losses of posts for graduates of X and ENA in the management structures of large French companies between 1995 and 1999.
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Clan, Entrenchment, Foreign Investors
How to cite this paper: Carminatti-Marchand, G., & Paquerot, M. (2004). The composition of French boards of directors: Changes since 1995. Corporate Ownership & Control, 1(3), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv1i3p11