data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/106a9/106a9eb3a5bb3bf8d1214b8d082bf2b68f5df593" alt=""
-
Journal menu
- General information
- Editorial Board and External Reviewers
- Journal Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Instructions for authors
- Paper reviewing
- Article processing charge
- Feedback from stakeholders
- Journal’s Open Access statement
- Order hard copies of the journal
- 50 most cited papers in the journal
THE SOX 404 PROCEDURE; IS IT STILL SO REPELLING TO FOREIGN ISSUERS?
Download This ArticleMarina Stefou
Abstract
The need for effective and competitive financial markets is reflected in the internal control procedures of listed companies. The recent banking crises and the famous financial scandals have revealed the need for strong internal control mechanisms. Such mechanisms improve firms performance, reduce information asymmetry and are expected to raise firms value. However, due to the inherent limitations of internal control achievement of the financial reporting objectives cannot be absolutely ensured. A great reform in the internal control mechanism was introduced by the controversial Article 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This paper lays out the internal control provision described in Sarbanes-Oxley Act, presents the extraterritorial effects on foreign issuers, compares and summarizes overall findings towards ensuring a better financial environment with regard to the international and European corporate governance framework applied.
Keywords : Corporate Governance, Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, Internal Control Mechanism, Extraterritoriality, Foreign Issuers and Effective Implementation
How to cite this paper: Stefou, M. (2008). The SOX 404 procedure; is it still so repelling to foreign issuers?. Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(1), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i1p15