To be better to be equal: In search of gender-based performance effects in financial statements of Italian unlisted company boards

Download This Article

Massimo Cecchi ORCID logo

https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i4art7

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Although Italy is characterized by a Rhine model of capitalism, with an underdeveloped stock exchange, previous studies on gender inequality have focused only on the analysis of the country’s few listed companies. Our study examines, instead, a larger sample of approximately 15,000 Italian limited companies, which include, in particular, unlisted companies. In the absence of estimates of these firms’ value on a stock market, the study measures performance based on financial statement data and ratios. No statistically significant correlations between performance and gender emerge. Therefore, if women have to “be better” to be treated “equally”, we can conclude that women do not seem to perform better than their male counterparts. However, women are not found to perform worse, either. Hence, we can also conclude that their underrepresentation can only be the result of sociocultural discrimination. We believe that this reversal of perspective should also be considered in future studies in search of overperformance to justify leading roles for women.

Keywords: Gender Inequality, Accounting Performance, Corporate Governance, Rhenan Capitalism

Authors’ individual contribution: The Author is responsible for all the contributions to the paper according to CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) standards.

Declaration of conflicting interests: The Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

JEL Classification: G30, G38, J16, M14

Received: 04.05.2021
Accepted: 09.07.2021
Published online: 12.07.2021

How to cite this paper: Cecchi, M. (2021). To be better to be equal: In search of gender-based performance effects in financial statements of Italian unlisted company boards. Corporate Ownership & Control, 18(4), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i4art7